Summary statements for new investigator R01 applications are prioritized, and when possible, released before summary statements for other applications reviewed in the same meeting. You may also enhance the rest of your application by adding any new information and data you wish. For example, you must address all your reviewers’ points and highlight their comments in the introduction and usually in the Research Plan unless too much has changed. Keep in mind you might not have a study section choice for some funding opportunity announcements, e. Abutment Plague in San Francisco: We can’t stress the point enough.
Resubmissions have several unique rules. You may also enhance the rest of your application by adding any new information and data you wish. You may be able to start revising right away, but take the time to do the best job you can. Then ask yourself these questions:. Resubmission Timing If you are on a list for possible selective pay or end-of-year funding, resubmit—don’t wait to see what will happen. This route is the most common one and works well when the points of contention are limited.
Keep in mind you might not have a study section choice for some funding opportunity announcements, e. Start revising as soon as you can and resubmit when ready, keeping in mind the caveats noted above and in the next section below. Add new findings and your own improvements. Don’t hesitate to make other changes. Before committing to a resubmission, you may want to assess your other Options if Your Application Isn’t Funded as well. Revising and Requesting a Different Study Section.
Keep in mind, if you list potential reviewers in conflict, acceptable explanations are conflict of interest, competitor, or long-standing scientific disagreement. If you disagree, explain why, and provide additional information if possible.
Revise and Resubmit an Application | NIH: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
September 17, Minutes: List scientific expertise letger to review your application. Be respectful even if you disagree. When you resubmit, you’re playing by new rules: But if changes are so extensive that most text would be affected, explain them in the introduction only.
You may want to begin revising even before you get your summary statement since waiting may cause you to miss the next receipt date.
That’s a clue that your application and the study section were a poor fit. If you are on a list for possible selective pay or end-of-year funding, resubmit—don’t wait to see what will happen.
You Will Still Use Cover Letters, but Not for Assignment Requests
January 29, Minutes: But be careful not to assume that the reviewers were the problem—first thoroughly size up the nihh faults that they identified. Make sure your introduction does the following: The applicants used formatting and sectioning to highlight key points and make it easier for reviews to read the text.
Summarizes the issues and criticisms and respond in as much detail as possible. Rules for Resubmitting Resubmissions have several unique rules. Your new study section sees the summary statement and expects you to make appropriate changes. Create a New Application.
Here’s how to proceed: State the title if you’re responding to an initiative. If possible within your introduction’s one-page limit, address comments point by point.
It’s better to wait for the next receipt date than send an application prematurely.
June 4, Minutes: Include any new preliminary data you have, and strengthen the application where possible—even in areas your reviewers did not question. Just keep in mind that you’ll still have to wait for your summary statement before you resubmit, and you may have to revise your application further based on what reviewers note. Many resubmissions score better than the initial application, though of course there’s no guarantee. January 29, Minutes: Abutment Plague in San Francisco: While you must address all the reviewers’ comments from your summary statement, you can start adding new data or making other improvements to the application.